The growing
trend in recent years of low-level academic achievers entering into the
teaching profession is a worrying phenomenon. Statistics released in May 2012
indicate that “Education was the least
popular course for school leavers with the highest university entrance scores,
with only 5 per cent of offers made to students with an Australian Tertiary
Admissions Rank (ATAR) above 90.05.”, and
“Almost 22 per cent of offers in education courses were made to students
with ATARs below 60, including almost 7 per cent of offers to students who
scored below 50” (Millburn, 2012). This kind of candidature of teachers
implicates that the ones entrusted to educate the future mini-Australians are
in fact, not necessarily the brightest, or the most academically skilled persons,
resulting in a growing fear of under-educated or poorly educated students – and
the snowballing of worsening teacher standards. The Australian government is
facilitating a number of ways to combat this phenomenon as part of the recently
revealed National Plan for School Improvement.
The idea of
performance-based pay as a way to combat this trend and provide incentive for
passionate, dedicated and skilled teachers is rife with ideas of
commodification as salary based motivation for better quality teaching is a
prime example of the way that education as a societal facet is being marketed and
commodified into a business.
Marketization refers to the
commodification of schooling into the market, by way of schools “importing
expertise from marketing and fundraising experts, developing
marketing plans, establishing sponsorship/fundraising committees and undertaking
advertising programmes”, (Kenway and Bullen, 2001,123), thus entering
themselves into the capitalist business market. Therefore rather than viewing
marketisation simply as the promotion of individual schools, it can be broadly
examined at the marketing of education as a whole. Given the candidature for
graduate and undergraduate teachers, the use of financial incentive to inspire
a better quality teaching culture by the government is allowing for the commodification
of teaching and schooling, across sectors of public and private nature. By previously
not individually rewarding the hard-working, passionate teachers the profession
needs, “our most experienced teachers are tempted to move to the education bureaucracy or
into school principal positions to increase their earnings,
or worse to leave teaching all together” (ALP Gillard ‘Fact sheet’, 2012), thus
leaving education in Australia in dire circumstances. Therefore initiatives
such a performance-based pay where teachers are rewarded for their individual
effort, as well as other forms of marketization such as the recent competition
launched by Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Federal Minister for Education
Peter Garrett, searching for ‘Australia’s Favourite Teacher’ (Go Teaching,
2012) are actually evidence of commodification of culture – the government is
aiming to create and market a culture of valuing education and teaching. The
increasing focus, funding and promotion of education in Australia has been
highly publicized but the ideas of education as a culture being marketised in
such ways has yet to be thoroughly examined for educational implications on the
future of our teachers and schools – will performance based pay alienate
teachers in less-advantaged schools who will find it much more challenging to
achieve the results the bonus requires, or will this kind of incentive serve to
encourage school-leaver to view education more seriously as a prospective
profession, no longer being deterred by the poor salaries they can expect for
most of their careers post-graduation. And further, will the hunt for ‘Australia’s
Best Teacher’ inspire students to aspire to be like their teachers, or will it
be viewed as a cheap political stunt to win favour by the politicians in power?
Go Teaching, 2012
‘Australia’s favourite teachers named’, Go Teaching – Great teaching jobs for
great teachers, 8 October. Accessed: 20/10/2012, URL: http://www.goteaching.com.au/australias-favourite-teachers-named/8521/
Gillard, Julia 2012, Reward
Payments for Great Teachers: Performance Pay Fact Sheet, Australian Labor
Party
Kenway, J. & Bullen, (2001). Consuming children:
Education-Entertainment-Advertising. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Chapter 5: Designer schools, packaged students.
Milburn, Caroline 2012 “Why our best teachers are worth $150,000”,
Sydney Morning Herald, 21 May, Accessed: 20/10/12 URL: http://www.smh.com.au/national/education/why-our-best-teachers-are-worth-150000-20120518-1yvyg.html#ixzz2AM7ruzRd
No comments:
Post a Comment